New statistics indicate that over 20 percent of Detroit is standing empty. One in 5 homes is abandoned or foreclosed on or both. And that is just one of many statistics that are so far over the top about the once-prosperous metropolis that they almost seem surreal. So it may come as no real surprise that the next step in the saga for Detroit is careful, contemplative, strategic destruction.

Turns out, Detroit officials have actually been considering reverting large swaths of the city back to farmland since the early 1990’s. Fruit trees and vegetable farms would replace empty neighborhoods, and the newly minimized metropolitan area would actually benefit, argue many urban development experts, because the people would be living in more concentrated patterns that would allow them to make better, more effective use of public services like transportation. Sound unthinkable? It certainly did to most Detroit natives until now.

“Things that were unthinkable and now becoming thinkable,” said James W. Hughes, dean of the School of Planning and Public Policy at Rutgers University, in an interview with a member of the associated press.

However, even for people who think the idea of downsizing Detroit is a good idea, the methods behind the process are frightening and unclear. This raises a lot of issues for real estate investors, who own or are at least considering investing in many of the properties in the area that are available for pennies on the dollar or, in some cases, fractions of pennies on the dollar. What happens to the owners? Do they receive a payment for the loss of their homes? And if you are invested in the area, do you also, or do you fall victim to a sweeping act of eminent domain by the local, state or federal government? And what does it mean for other areas that are currently in serious economic distress? Can the members of the city vote the investors out?

Other, smaller cities have made downsizing and shrinking work for them. Youngstown, Ohio is a good example. But while most of the news from that area is good when it comes to the results and ramifications of deliberate downsizing, you don’t hear much from the owners of the properties – and they have to be out there somewhere – that were demolished.

I want to know what happens – and what the precedents that will be set if this goes through will mean for investors everywhere.