Fannie Mae thinks the borrowers of this country are important – including the ones that do not always pay their bills on time. “In an effort to support overall market stability and reinforce the importance of borrowers working with their servicers when they have difficulty repaying their debt,” Fannie Mae has updated the “waiting period” regulations that used to require borrowers who defaulted on their loans to wait a period of years before borrowing through Fannie Mae again.
These updates specifically concern preforeclosure events. They do not deal, currently, with homes that go through the entire foreclosure process and are repossessed by the lender. According to Fannie Mae, a preforeclosure event can be a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transaction, a preforeclosure sale or a short sale.
Prior to last Friday, April 16, when these updates went into effect, borrowers who had been involved in a preforeclosure event had to wait a specified amount of time – 4 years for deed-in-lieu, 2 years for a preforeclosure sale, and an undetermined amount of time for short sales – before they could get a new mortgage from the mortgage giant.
Now, however, waiting periods will be much more flexible. Instead of being determined by the type of preforeclosure event, the requisite waiting period, if there is one, will be determined by an evaluative process that factors in the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio for the preforeclosure transaction, the occupancy of the property, and the “extenuating circumstances” that led to the borrower’s inability to pay. Borrowers with an 80 percent maximum LTV ratio will have to wait 2 years to obtain a new mortgage, while those with 90 percent maximum LTV ratios will have to wait 4. If you have an LTV higher than 90, you could have to wait up to 7 years.
This may sound daunting, but there are a number of loopholes built in. Waiting period exceptions apply to borrowers with extenuating circumstances like loss of employment or if they can show that they have worked on reestablishing their credit. In fact, the highest LTV ratio waiting period can be cut down to 2 years if you can show adequate hardship, which is loosely defined.
On one hand, these policies could be a great way to get people back into houses and participating in the growth of the housing market much sooner. However, I fear that the loosely defined nature of “extenuating circumstances” leaves the door wide open for corrupt, predatory lenders and mortgage brokers to start putting people back into homes they cannot afford in just a few years. Think about last year’s loan modification fiascos, in which the “middle men” made hundreds of thousands on incentives for loan mods that they knew would never, could never, should never go through. This seems like a window for the same problem.
However, I’m excited about a new buying population being back on the market in potentially 2 years instead of 7 or more, particularly if they really did just have a really bad run of luck that they have been able to resolve to mortgage brokers’ satisfaction. I think this new program has a lot of potential for good and bad.
Thank you for reading http://realestate.BryanEllis.com – your comments are welcomed in the space below!

If Fannie Mae is involved one thing is certain, it will poorly managed, full of corruption and the taxpayer will once again be left holding the bag.
Don’t they think Fannie and Freddie are far enough underwater now?
Why would anyone ever want to borrow from Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac ever again? 2 years, 4 years, 7 years… who cares? I wouldn’t get a government subsidized loan in 100 years. I don’t want a government subsidized anything! Those are bankrupt companies! That should tell you something – they don’t know how to run a profitable business! Neither do any of the big Wall Street banks. They’re all insolvent! Our entire government is insolvent right now, and you’re hoping that foreclosed homeowners will be able to borrow again from GSE’s as soon as possible? You’re an ignorant, selfish person. GSE’s like Fannie, Freddie, Ginnie, HUD, and the NAR have decimated any inkling of a free market economy in this country. And all you can think about is how to profit off the destruction of your own country. You’re despicable!
Geez Todd. Read a little closer. There was no ringing endorsement in this article. And by the way, I don’t think you’re despicable, arrogant or anything else – maybe just a little too eager to criticize. — Bryan Ellis
Great news! Yes there is the possibility of fraud and manipulation, but it will help the real estate get on solid footing, and help out borrowers that truly need the help.
Does it really matter who the lender is, if they are going to lend you the money, take it and enjoy that is what I say,
This DOES NOT surprise me on iota!
The government, fannie, freddy NONE of them could EVER manage anything right.. and this will be no different!
Let’s see where this all goes…
To
It’s amazing how people just love to lay blame without consideration to how things work in this world. Sure you can say that Fannie and Freddie were mismanaged. You can say that about most of the major banks, Wall St. and of course, our government. But placing blind blame does no one any good. The bubbles we have experienced have been brought on by mismanagement by the Fed of interest rates, that much is true. And yes, lenders, including Fannie and Freddie should have been tightening the reins as asset valuations rose ever higher instead of keeping the spigots open. But hindsight is 20/20. I for one applaud Fannie’s realization that something needs to be done to open the market to people that experienced troubles just like the lenders did. Lenders and corporations are able to borrow millions of dollars, default, and then borrow more. Homeowners should not be the only ones to be shut off from future borrowing because they underwent problems in the past.
Personally, I feel at some point we should allow for a credit amnesty… a one time event that a person can have their entire credit report wiped clean. If you can wipe out debts with a bankruptcy, why not a credit wipe out… one time?
Well, I know that won’t happen but the sooner lenders realize that they can stabilize real estate values by LOOSENING their stringent guidelines, the quicker this country can get back on its feet. And it doesn’t mean there’s going to be another bubble, that’s ridiculous. Not in real estate anyway