We all know that strategic defaulting is questionable at best, but what to do when your lender tells you it’s the only way to get some help?  Yes, you read that right:  Borrowers are increasingly likely to be given the “unofficial” advice to strategically default on their loan, and this advice now sometimes comes from their lender!

Here’s how that type of scenario plays out:

A home owner who perceives their property to be financially nonsensical – even if they have the ability to pay the note – contacts their lender to see if a loan modification or other solution may be available to them.  Due to the clear lack of financial distress, the lender officially rejects the request for a modification.  But unofficially, the customer service representative makes it clear to the borrower that they could simply stop paying the note and effectively “give back” the property.

Since foreclosure is so prevalent in the news, and the government has made home owners feel like “it’s not their fault” they have a bad loan, loans are being ‘strategically’ defaulted by the millions.

I suspect this type of scenario plays out due to the pity the customer service representative feels for the home owner rather than an official policy on the part of the lender.   Of course, if a lender or loan representative is advising you to stop paying, it can seem almost like a promise that help is on the way in exchange for giving your credit score a hit. However, homeowners must remember that these are hardly ever promises, and it’s also pretty likely that a lender is going to vehemently deny advising you to default on your loan.

This leads to the question: when does one stop paying the mortgage?  I suspect that when this question is evaluated free of the influence of financial pressure, the answer is:  “Never”.  But strategic defaults are increasing at such a rapid clip that it’s clear that this opinion isn’t widely held.

Also Important:  In your real estate investment activities, be very careful about “advising” any home owners you are working with to strategically default.  In addition to the ethical problem involved, investors must be very careful not only how they go about handling these types of transactions, but also how they are perceived and recorded when they are dealing with strategic defaults. Lenders are more than happy to blame investors rather than their own representatives for property owners’ failures to pay, and with strategic defaults climbing each quarter, real estate investors make themselves a bigger and bigger target if they are determined to be advising homeowners to stop making loan payments. Not to mention creating a serious legal liability… It’s easy to imagine a judge assigning legal responsibility to an investor for a strategic default since it’s the style of our government at present to refuse to allow home owners to be ‘at fault’ for their own poor decisions.

Thank you for reading the Bryan Ellis Real Estate Letter – your comments and questions are welcomed!