Most of you probably saw this coming, but that does not make it any less unpleasant. Rumors are swirling that on top of the $145 billion the two mortgage giants have already received, the entities will need another roughly $1 trillion to meet the demands of a “reasonable worst-case scenario for the companies” should the market continue to resolve slowly rather than with leaps and bounds[1].

Analysts and politicians seem to agree that simply cutting Fannie and Freddie off would produce a dangerous environment not only for the national housing market and economy, but for the state of global finances as well. Some compare it to the U.S. going off the gold standard in the 1930s. Furthermore, since foreign governments hold $908 billion in corporate debt sold by Fannie and Freddie, cutting the GSEs loose could have a staggering effect on the United States’ international relations and ability to navigate the international economy and market as well.

For now, politicians will continue to struggle with this issue as the newly-reconciled financial reform bill hits the floors of the House and Senate. At this time, the U.S. Treasury plans to keep both Fannie and Freddie afloat, while many representatives want to phase them out (which looks unlikely at this point). How do you think we should handle this problem? Should we “suck it up” and pay the trillion dollars in order to bail out Fannie and Freddie?

Thank you for reading! Your comments and questions are welcomed below.

[1] http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-06-14/fannie-freddie-fix-at-160-billion-with-1-trillion-worst-case.html