Less than a decade ago, real estate investors were generally known for fixing and flipping houses quickly while driving prices ever upward.  But now the trend for many real estate investors is to buy and hold, renting out their properties to create a steady income by providing single-family housing for people who cannot currently buy and don’t want an apartment, and stabilizing neighborhoods and property valuations in the process. I guess this is why CNN – that bastion of anti-capitalist buffoonery – decided to label such investors as “vultures”[1].

That’s right – if you “swoop in and buy ‘distressed properties’… cheap” – particularly in struggling markets like Phoenix, Miami and Las Vegas – you get the distinction of being a “vulture” in CNN’s view.

Admittedly, the article is not entirely negative about real estate investors, which is clearly a good thing.  But what’s annoying is the clear unwillingness to recognize and acknowledge that profiting from a bad situation doesn’t mean that a person is doing anything that’s illegal, unethical or even questionable – and certainly isn’t cause for saddling a person with a label with negative connotations like “vulture”.

But there’s another angle to consider:

This type of media coverage for our industry is common but is neither accurate nor reasonable.  But then again, it may be nothing to worry about since CNN has become increasingly irrelevant to a more discerning market in recent years, as evidenced by its inability to beat (or even come close to) rival Fox News Channel during all 24 hours of the broadcast day.  Media bias against capitalism (including us as investors) definitely exists, but it seems that the media broadcasting those biases are becoming less relevant.

Have you encountered this type of sentiment in your real estate investing? Does it bother you?

Thank you for reading! Your comments and questions are welcomed below.

[1] http://money.cnn.com/2010/08/02/real_estate/new_vulture_investing/