At a recent housing crisis meeting in Washington, D.C., Sandra Pianalto, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, said something that investors have been saying for literally years now and that the federal government certainly did not want to hear: “no one-size-fits-all short term remedies [for the housing crisis] would work.” Pianalto went on to say that the nation’s housing market collapse was the result of a destructive cycle with many different facets that fed – and is feeding – on itself. Those facets include mortgage delinquencies, foreclosures, housing oversupply, depreciating prices and big losses on the parts of borrowers and financial institutions[1].

Pianalto said that the only way to break the cycle is with a “coordinated set of policies to target multiple points of the breakdown in the housing market,” specifically by finding better ways to implement the Neighborhood Stabilization Program and the Community Reinvestment Act. She believes that at this point it is the responsibility of whomever actually still owns properties – be they homeowners, lenders or community organizations – to maintain houses in such a way as to improve resale values and enhance communities.

It seems to me that this presentation is a perfect example of too little, too late. Now that the federal government is irrevocably tied up in the housing recovery – and largely involved in delaying it – finally someone has spoken up and said that massive social programs may not be the answer to the problem. I would frankly be happier if Pianalto had said that the government needed to get out of the recovery all together, though I think that is highly improbable and maybe even impossible. Do you agree that better maintenance of property is the key to housing price recovery, or do you think this view is simplistic?

Thank you for reading the Bryan Ellis Real Estate Letter! Your comments and questions are welcomed below.

[1] http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/09/02/feds-pianalto-multiple-solutions-needed-for-housing-crisis/