All you need to qualify, this lender advertises, is “a pulse and a legal ability to sign.” Why? Because he doesn’t want his money back; he wants your house. And he’ll tell you up front that he’s ready, willing, and able to take it[1]. So why would people borrow money from Emiel Kandi, who has made “hundreds of thousands of dollars” in a shady corner of the lending industry, taking control of collateral property on loans that are barely delinquent and flipping them as quickly as possible to turn a profit? “I’m a wolf,” he admits, but sometimes people are desperate.

Kandi is a hard money lender – an entirely respectable trade and one on which real estate investors have relied for years – but he’s out there unabashedly giving the entire industry a really lousy reputation. He proudly explains how he skirted mortgage requirements and disclosures by writing up the loans he makes as “commercial,” which kept him free of many regulations imposed on other types of lending transactions. A lawyer who has sued Kandi – and won, although the payoff does not appear to be forthcoming – describes him as “in the business of taking people’s property” and exploiting vulnerable people. Could be, says, Kandi, but they were the ones who signed.

Kandi argues that he has done nothing wrong in his hard money business, making it extremely clear that he will take borrowers’ property and even that it is his goal to do so. While some of the borrowers are now claiming that they did not understand what they were signing, Kandi claims that they are just “crying foul” because they cannot pay the money back. Things get hazy as “good, hardworking people” then claim that Kandi is refusing cash payments or not recording them, and the aggressive, somewhat arrogant and dislikable lender is equally adamant that the borrowers simply didn’t have the funds. Pile on top of that the issue that a number of Kandi’s “customers” won’t talk about their dealings with him for fear of “repercussions,” and you’ve got one big, mysterious, nasty mess on your hands no matter who is ultimately at fault.

For now, however, Kandi is in the clear. What he is doing is not currently illegal, and the people who owe him are losing their lawsuits in a lot of cases.

Do you think that this type of lending is appropriate? Are people like Emiel Kandi part of the reason real estate investors get such a bad rap?

Thank you for reading The Bryan Ellis Real Estate Letter! Your comments and questions are welcomed below.

[1] http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2013427831_hardmoney14.html