Lest there be any confusion, the Obama administration firmly stated yesterday that “President Barack Obama would veto a Republican-backed bill killing his signature mortgage foreclosure prevention program”[1]. In a statement from the administration, it was stated that the Obama administration “strongly opposes” House action to eliminate HAMP” and that the president’s “senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill”[2].

While the efforts to terminate HAMP and other foreclosure prevention measures are largely a Republican initiative as they seek to weed out unnecessary spending in the federal budget, both sides of the aisle have parties in agreement that HAMP in particular is doing more harm than good, as former inspector general of TARP, Neil Barofsky, testified earlier this year before stepping down from his post. George Miller, (D-CA), called HAMP “an arbitrary, capricious system that kicks hard-working people out on the street,” adding that “the administration cannot allow this to continue.” Republicans agree, and also add that the program has been so incredibly inefficient – helping only about half a million Americans instead of the projected three- or four million into new loans that many have defaulted on – that it cannot be allowed to continue.

Secretary of the Treasury, Timothy Geithner, has said that ending the HAMP program could do significant damage to the housing market. Do you agree that HAMP must be maintained for the housing market to recover?

Thank you for reading the Bryan Ellis Real Estate Letter!

Your comments and questions are welcomed below.


[1] http://kgmi.com/Obama-would-veto-bill-killing-foreclosure-preventi/9410648

[2] http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2011/03/obama-administration-issues-veto-threat-against-bill-to-end-controversial-hamp-housing-program.html