The state of Montana believes that it should have the right to exercise authority over federal land within the state – and the state legislature is working to “override the powers the U.S. government holds in the state” via Senate Bill 254, which would give Montana eminent domain authority over federal land within its borders[1]. Jonathan McNiven, a republican from Huntley, Montana, points out that the federal government owns about a third of all the land in Montana. McNiven believes that this ownership is “denying [the state] beneficial…uses” of the land, including access to natural resources. The state house passed the measure on Friday and it has already passed in the senate[2].

Utah passed a law similar to the one being proposed in Montana last year and also set aside money for the legal challenges expected to follow. Interestingly, no lawsuits have yet been filed. However, officials expect fallout when they complete a current suit designed to “claim hundreds of roads” in the state. Interestingly, motions to study the impact of eminent domain on landowner rights and another measure to “bolster landowner rights” in the face of eminent domain both died in the house last week while this groundbreaking legislation was passed.

Do you think that states should have the right to take over federal lands via eminent domain?

Thank you for reading the Bryan Ellis Real Estate Letter!

Your comments and questions are welcomed below.


[1] http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9MAS6TO0.htm

[2] http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/f4287ee6a450408a9da25f87c4e594ff/MT-XGR–Eminent-Domain/