<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Resolution Trust Corporation - A Real Estate Investing Opportunity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realestate.bryanellis.com/480/resolution-trust-corporation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realestate.bryanellis.com/480/resolution-trust-corporation/</link>
	<description>The *Alternative Media* For Serious Real Estate Investors</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 20:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Caitlyn Coyle</title>
		<link>http://realestate.bryanellis.com/480/resolution-trust-corporation/#comment-2421</link>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Coyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freerealestatetraining.com/?p=480#comment-2421</guid>
		<description>If the two of you buy the property--that is, you provide the down payment and the occupant provides qualifying income and credit--the occupant has no skin in the game (not even first and last months rent!) and all rights of ownership. You would have to gift that person the down payment or you'd have to give him the down payment and have him put it in his single ownership account for three months while the money seasons.  If you did this with a family member, it might work; otherwise, I think you're asking for trouble.  If you signed an agreement outside of escrow, you would be admitting that it wasn't the occupant's intent to fully occupy the property.

The parents of my friend loaned her and her husband a 20% down payment and signed a gift letter for over $100,000.  When the couple divorced, they sold the property.  It was expected that, under the circumstances, her parents were to be reimbursed.  Husband said, "No, they signed a gift letter.  Wife, you do what you want, but they get nothing out of my share of the equity."  There was nothing the parents could do about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the two of you buy the property&#8211;that is, you provide the down payment and the occupant provides qualifying income and credit&#8211;the occupant has no skin in the game (not even first and last months rent!) and all rights of ownership. You would have to gift that person the down payment or you&#8217;d have to give him the down payment and have him put it in his single ownership account for three months while the money seasons.  If you did this with a family member, it might work; otherwise, I think you&#8217;re asking for trouble.  If you signed an agreement outside of escrow, you would be admitting that it wasn&#8217;t the occupant&#8217;s intent to fully occupy the property.</p>
<p>The parents of my friend loaned her and her husband a 20% down payment and signed a gift letter for over $100,000.  When the couple divorced, they sold the property.  It was expected that, under the circumstances, her parents were to be reimbursed.  Husband said, &#8220;No, they signed a gift letter.  Wife, you do what you want, but they get nothing out of my share of the equity.&#8221;  There was nothing the parents could do about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Miller</title>
		<link>http://realestate.bryanellis.com/480/resolution-trust-corporation/#comment-2389</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freerealestatetraining.com/?p=480#comment-2389</guid>
		<description>@Caitlyn Coyle:  I'm not talking about non-owner occupied.  I'm talking about partnering with someone who needs a place to live for a year and putting them on title (with a contract between you and the partner).  If nothing else, you can provide the loan for the person that is due in one year (not my preference though).  In fact, it's likely that you could be on title with the partner for added protection but it all depends on the actual wording of the offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Caitlyn Coyle:  I&#8217;m not talking about non-owner occupied.  I&#8217;m talking about partnering with someone who needs a place to live for a year and putting them on title (with a contract between you and the partner).  If nothing else, you can provide the loan for the person that is due in one year (not my preference though).  In fact, it&#8217;s likely that you could be on title with the partner for added protection but it all depends on the actual wording of the offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caitlyn Coyle</title>
		<link>http://realestate.bryanellis.com/480/resolution-trust-corporation/#comment-2384</link>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Coyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freerealestatetraining.com/?p=480#comment-2384</guid>
		<description>Jeff, you're correct that non-owner occupants are allowed under FHA guidelines; not so much under conforming guidelines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, you&#8217;re correct that non-owner occupants are allowed under FHA guidelines; not so much under conforming guidelines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Miller</title>
		<link>http://realestate.bryanellis.com/480/resolution-trust-corporation/#comment-2372</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 14:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freerealestatetraining.com/?p=480#comment-2372</guid>
		<description>@Chris &#38; Bill: Yes, how you do it is very important.  

Note: I said partner with someone who will live in the property.  If that person is on title and living there, it is owner occupied for the current definition of owner occupied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris &amp; Bill: Yes, how you do it is very important.  </p>
<p>Note: I said partner with someone who will live in the property.  If that person is on title and living there, it is owner occupied for the current definition of owner occupied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notmyrealname</title>
		<link>http://realestate.bryanellis.com/480/resolution-trust-corporation/#comment-2371</link>
		<dc:creator>notmyrealname</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 03:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freerealestatetraining.com/?p=480#comment-2371</guid>
		<description>Caught? Fined? Oh please, my dog owns more property than I do. 

Just kidding. 
or am I...?

Keep up the good articles. Any thoughts on raising capital, certainly my technique of shorting financials isn't going to work anymore...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caught? Fined? Oh please, my dog owns more property than I do. </p>
<p>Just kidding.<br />
or am I&#8230;?</p>
<p>Keep up the good articles. Any thoughts on raising capital, certainly my technique of shorting financials isn&#8217;t going to work anymore&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://realestate.bryanellis.com/480/resolution-trust-corporation/#comment-2368</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freerealestatetraining.com/?p=480#comment-2368</guid>
		<description>Jeff,  The fine for getting caught buying owner occupied property as an investor was $250,000........not many tried that I'm sure...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,  The fine for getting caught buying owner occupied property as an investor was $250,000&#8230;&#8230;..not many tried that I&#8217;m sure&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caitlyn Coyle</title>
		<link>http://realestate.bryanellis.com/480/resolution-trust-corporation/#comment-2366</link>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Coyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freerealestatetraining.com/?p=480#comment-2366</guid>
		<description>** It would be great to know total REO’s by city or state, so we would know where to find the best deals. **

Prowl around these analytical sites:

&lt;a href="http://www.MGIC.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.MGIC.com&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.PMI.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.PMI.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>** It would be great to know total REO’s by city or state, so we would know where to find the best deals. **</p>
<p>Prowl around these analytical sites:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.MGIC.com" target="_blank">http://www.MGIC.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.PMI.com" target="_blank">http://www.PMI.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://realestate.bryanellis.com/480/resolution-trust-corporation/#comment-2365</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freerealestatetraining.com/?p=480#comment-2365</guid>
		<description>Jeff, have to be very careful how this is done. It can be construed as fraud depending on how it is done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, have to be very careful how this is done. It can be construed as fraud depending on how it is done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy T</title>
		<link>http://realestate.bryanellis.com/480/resolution-trust-corporation/#comment-2364</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freerealestatetraining.com/?p=480#comment-2364</guid>
		<description>Bryan, have you found any stats on the actual number of SFH REO's at this time?  Hard to guess, the way the media reports things, you'd think every other home in the country has been foreclosed.

It would be great to know total REO's by city or state, so we would know where to find the best deals.

That said, as I recall, the window closed very quickly on the RTC deals for small investors, and they went to bulk sales that only the big dogs could afford.  I'm guessing the big money sharks are drooling right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan, have you found any stats on the actual number of SFH REO&#8217;s at this time?  Hard to guess, the way the media reports things, you&#8217;d think every other home in the country has been foreclosed.</p>
<p>It would be great to know total REO&#8217;s by city or state, so we would know where to find the best deals.</p>
<p>That said, as I recall, the window closed very quickly on the RTC deals for small investors, and they went to bulk sales that only the big dogs could afford.  I&#8217;m guessing the big money sharks are drooling right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caitlyn Coyle</title>
		<link>http://realestate.bryanellis.com/480/resolution-trust-corporation/#comment-2362</link>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Coyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freerealestatetraining.com/?p=480#comment-2362</guid>
		<description>People are already figuring out "get arounds" to exploit our failed system.  Great.  Just great.

&lt;strong&gt;The premise of your statement is flawed, assuming the common negative connotation of the word "exploit".  I can't imagine why it's a negative thing to brainstorm ways to take best advantage of the situation that the government has forced upon us.  -- &lt;a href="http://hubpages.com/hub/Bryan-Ellis" target="_blank" title="Bryan Ellis" rel="nofollow"&gt;Bryan Ellis&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are already figuring out &#8220;get arounds&#8221; to exploit our failed system.  Great.  Just great.</p>
<p><strong>The premise of your statement is flawed, assuming the common negative connotation of the word &#8220;exploit&#8221;.  I can&#8217;t imagine why it&#8217;s a negative thing to brainstorm ways to take best advantage of the situation that the government has forced upon us.  &#8212; <a href="http://hubpages.com/hub/Bryan-Ellis" target="_blank" title="Bryan Ellis">Bryan Ellis</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
