These are strange times in the mortgage business.
Bankers have long assumed that a mortgage borrower would do virtually anything necessary to stay in their home and avoid the stigma of foreclosure, including opting to withhold payment on other bills in order to stay current on their mortgage payments. And for decades, this assumption has been correct.
Not any more.
Two big trends have emerged recently, both of which were completely unexpected by mortgage lenders:
- “Strategic Defaults”: Faced with declining equity, home owners - many of whom are financially able to make their payments - are walking away from the properties to “start over” in a different home that has lower financial commitments and/or more potential for price appreciation
- “Credit Card Prioritization”: TransUnion says that there’s been a 58%+ jump in the number of consumers who are current on their credit card payments but delinquent on their home mortgages. Consumers appear to be prioritizing ready access to cash over [negative] home equity
It totally makes sense to me why a person would prioritize their credit card payments over their mortgage when the value of their home is likely far “below water”. After all, you have to eat, and a home can’t buy food.
The question of “strategic default” is stickier. My gut-level reaction is to condemn those who are financially able yet still choose to walk away from their obligations. But is that reasonable? I’m not so sure - if there are agreed-upon penalties for default (such as foreclosure and the damage it causes to one’s credit rating), and that person consciously choose to accept those penalties, then has that person violated any ethical or moral requirement?
I think a good argument could be made in either direction. What do you think? Your comments are welcomed, and encouraged, below - and thank you for reading http://realestate.BryanEllis.com!


Since 2007, mortgage lenders have clamped down in many areas of underwriting, but none more so than in the area of credit scoring.
SECURE & CONFIDENTIAL